We always watch this one closely due to the prophecy in the Book of Daniel.
This could be more art of the deal rhetoric, or legitimate. We know using force against Iran has been in the works for decades. Nevertheless, you can’t threaten someone with death or your deal, and expect them to negotiate. Everyone has some form of self respect.
What’s this all about?
Recently, the U.S. President said,
"There are two ways Iran can be handled, militarily or you make a deal. I would prefer to make a deal. I would rather negotiate a deal. I’m not sure that everybody agrees with me, but we can make a deal that would be just as good as if you won militarily.
But the time is happening now, the time is coming up. Something is going to happen one way or the other. I hope that Iran, and I’ve written them a letter, saying I hope you’re going to negotiate because if we have to go in militarily it’s going to be a terrible thing for them."
Iran’s “Supreme” Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei accused Washington of seeking even greater restrictions than in previous negotiations saying,
“Some bully governments insist on negotiations. But their negotiations are not aimed at solving issues, but to dominate and impose their own expectations.”
“For them, negotiation is a means to introduce new demands. The issue is not just about nuclear matters, they raise new expectations that Iran will certainly not accept.”
“They demand restrictions on the country’s defensive capabilities and international influence, saying: ‘don’t do this, don’t meet that person, don’t produce that item’ or ‘your missile range should not exceed a certain limit.'”
- What do you think folks?
- Where is this going?